The Cult of Kubernetes
Published on , 2062 words, 8 minutes to read
or: How I got my blog onto it with autodeployment via GitHub Actions.
The world was once a simple place. Things used to make sense, or at least there weren't so many layers that it became difficult to tell what the hell is going on.
Then complexity happened. This is a tale of how I literally recreated this meme:
Deployed my blog on Kubernetes pic.twitter.com/XHXWLrmYO4
— DevOps Thought Liker (@dexhorthy) April 24, 2017
This is how I deployed my blog (the one you are reading right now) to Kubernetes.
The Old State of the World
Before I deployed my blog to Kubernetes, I used Dokku, as I had been for years. Dokku is great. It emulates most of the Heroku "git push; don't care" workflow, but on your own server that you can self-manage.
This is a blessing and a curse.
The real advantage of managed services like Heroku is that you literally just HAND OFF operations to Heroku's team. This is not the case with Dokku. Unless you pay someone a lot of money, you are going to have to manage the server yourself. My dokku server was unmanaged, and I run many apps on it (this listing was taken after I started to move apps over):
=====> My Apps
bsnk
cinemaquestria
fordaplot-backup
graphviz.christine.website
identicond
ilo-kesi
johaus
maison
olin
printerfacts
since
tulpaforce.tk
tulpanomicon
This is enough apps (plus 5 more that I've already migrated) that it really doesn't make sense paying for something like Heroku; nor does it really make sense to use the free tier either.
So, I decided that it was time for me to properly learn how to Kubernetes, and I set off to create a cluster via DigitalOcean managed Kubernetes.
The Cluster
I decided it would be a good idea to create my cluster using Terraform, mostly because I wanted to learn how to use it better. I use Terraform at work, so I figured this would also be a way to level up my skills in a mostly sane environment.
Terraform is suffering as a service
— Cadey Ratio 🌐 (@theprincessxena) August 24, 2019
I have been creating and playing with a small Terraform wrapper tool called
dyson. This tool is probably overly simplistic and is written in Nim.
With the config in ~/.config/dyson/dyson.ini
, I can simplify my Terraform
usage by moving my secrets out of the Terraform code directly. I also avoid
having my API tokens exposed in my shell to avoid accidental exposure of the
secrets.
Dyson is very simple to use:
$ dyson
Usage:
dyson {SUBCMD} [sub-command options & parameters]
where {SUBCMD} is one of:
help print comprehensive or per-cmd help
apply apply Terraform code to production
destroy destroy resources managed by Terraform
env dump envvars
init init Terraform
manifest generate a somewhat sane manifest for a kubernetes app based on the arguments.
plan plan a future Terraform run
slug2docker converts a heroku/dokku slug to a docker image
dyson {-h|--help} or with no args at all prints this message.
dyson --help-syntax gives general cligen syntax help.
Run "dyson {help SUBCMD|SUBCMD --help}" to see help for just SUBCMD.
Run "dyson help" to get *comprehensive* help.
So I wrote up my config:
# main.tf
provider "digitalocean" {}
resource "digitalocean_kubernetes_cluster" "main" {
name = "kubermemes"
region = "${var.region}"
version = "${var.kubernetes_version}"
node_pool {
name = "worker-pool"
size = "${var.node_size}"
node_count = 2
}
}
# variables.tf
variable "region" {
type = "string"
default = "nyc3"
}
variable "kubernetes_version" {
type = "string"
default = "1.15.3-do.1"
}
variable "node_size" {
type = "string"
default = "s-1vcpu-2gb"
}
and ran it:
$ dyson plan
<... many lines of plan output ...>
$ dyson apply
<... many lines of apply output ...>
Then I had a working but mostly unconfigured Kubernetes cluster.
Configuration
This is where things started to go downhill. I wanted to do a few things with this cluster so I could consider it "ready" for me to use for deploying applications to.
I wanted to do the following:
- setup helm to install packages for things like DNS management and HTTP/HTTPS ingress
- setup automatic certificate management with Let's Encrypt
- setup HTTP/HTTPS request ingress with nginx-ingress (which uses nginx)
- setup automatic DNS management because the external IP addresses of Kubernetes nodes can and will change
After a lot of trial, error, pain, suffering and the like, I created this script which I am not pasting here. Look at it if you want to get a streamlined overview of how to set these things up.
Now that all of this is set up, I can deploy an example app with a manifest that looks something like this:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: hello-kubernetes-first
annotations:
external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname: exanple.within.website
external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/ttl: "120" #optional
external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/cloudflare-proxied: "false"
spec:
type: ClusterIP
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 8080
selector:
app: hello-kubernetes-first
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: hello-kubernetes-first
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: hello-kubernetes-first
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: hello-kubernetes-first
spec:
containers:
- name: hello-kubernetes
image: paulbouwer/hello-kubernetes:1.5
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
env:
- name: MESSAGE
value: Henlo this are an exanple deployment
---
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: hello-kubernetes-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
certmanager.k8s.io/cluster-issuer: "letsencrypt-prod"
spec:
tls:
- hosts:
- exanple.within.website
secretName: prod-certs
rules:
- host: exanple.within.website
http:
paths:
- backend:
serviceName: hello-kubernetes-first
servicePort: 80
Nope, I was wrong, Kubernetes is the real suffering as a service
— Cadey Ratio 🌐 (@theprincessxena) September 6, 2019
It was about this time when I wondered if I was making a mistake moving off of Dokku. Dokku really does a lot to abstract almost everything involved with nginx away from you, and it really shows.
However, as a side effect of everything being so declarative and Kubernetes really
not assuming anything, you have a lot more freedom to do basically anything
you want. You don't have to have specially magic names for tasks like web
or
worker
like you do in Heroku/Dokku. You just have a deployment that belongs to
an "app" that just so happens to expose a TCP port that just so happens to have
a correlating ingress associated with it.
Lucky for me, most of the apps I write fit into that general format, and the ones that don't can mostly use the same format without the ingress.
So I templated that sucker as a subcommand in dyson. This lets me do commands like this:
$ dyson manifest \
--name=hlang \
--domain=h.christine.website \
--dockerImage=docker.pkg.github.com/xe/x/h:v1.1.8 \
--containerPort=5000 \
--replicas=1 \
--useProdLE=true | kubectl apply -f-
And the service gets shunted into the cloud without any extra effort on my part. This also automatically sets up Let's Encrypt, DNS and other things that were manual in my Dokku setup. This saves me time for when I want to go add services in the future. All I have to do is create a docker image somehow, identify what port should be exposed, give it a domain name and number of replicas and just send it on its merry way.
GitHub Actions
This does however mean that deployment is no longer as simple as "git push; don't care". This is where GitHub Actions come into play. They claimed to have the ability to run full end-to-end CI/CD on my applications.
I have been using them for a while for CI on my website and have been pleased with them, so I decided to give it a try and set up continuous deployment with them.
As the commit log for the deployment manifest can tell, this took a lot of trial and error. One of the main sources of problems here was that GitHub Actions had recently had a lot of changes made to configuration and usage as compared to when it was in private beta. This included changing the configuration schema from HCL to YAML.
Of course, all of the documentation (outside of GitHub's quite excellent documentation) was out of date and wrong. I tried following a tutorial by DigitalOcean themselves on how to do this exact thing I wanted to do, but it referenced the old HCL syntax for GitHub Actions and did not work. To make things worse, examples in the marketplace READMEs simply DID NOT WORK because they were written for the old GitHub Actions syntax.
This was frustrating to say the least.
After trying to make them work anyways with a combination of the "Use Latest
Version" button in the marketplace, prayer and gratuitous use of the with.args
field in steps I gave up and decided to manually download the tools I needed
from their upstream providers and execute them by hand.
This is how I ended up with this monstrosity:
- name: Configure/Deploy/Verify Kubernetes
run: |
curl -L https://github.com/digitalocean/doctl/releases/download/v1.30.0/doctl-1.30.0-linux-amd64.tar.gz | tar xz
./doctl auth init -t $DIGITALOCEAN_ACCESS_TOKEN
./doctl kubernetes cluster kubeconfig show kubermemes > .kubeconfig
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/`curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/stable.txt`/bin/linux/amd64/kubectl
chmod +x kubectl
./kubectl --kubeconfig .kubeconfig apply -n apps -f deploy.yml
sleep 2
./kubectl --kubeconfig .kubeconfig rollout -n apps status deployment/christinewebsite
env:
DIGITALOCEAN_ACCESS_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DIGITALOCEAN_TOKEN }}
I am almost certain that I am doing it wrong here, I don't know how robust this
is and I'm very sure that this can and should be done another way; but this is
the only thing I could get working (for some definition of "working").
EDIT: it got fixed, see below
kubernetes is a cult
— Andrew Kelley (@andy_kelley) September 6, 2019
Now when I git push things to the master branch of my blog repo, it will automatically get deployed to my Kubernetes cluster.
If you work at DigitalOcean and are reading this post. Please get someone to
update this tutorial and the README of this repo.
The examples listed DO NOT WORK for me because I was not in the private beta
of GitHub Actions. It would also be nice if you had better documentation on how
to use your premade action for usecases like mine. I just
wanted to download the kubernetes configuration file and run apply against a yaml
file.
EDIT: The above complaint has been fixed! See here for the simpler way of doing things.
Thanks for reading, I hope this was entertaining. Be well.
Facts and circumstances may have changed since publication. Please contact me before jumping to conclusions if something seems wrong or unclear.
Tags: kubernetes, digitalocean, githubactions